<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Siberian Journal of Economic and Business Studies</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Siberian Journal of Economic and Business Studies</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Сибирский журнал экономических и бизнес-исследований</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">3033-5973</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Science and Innovation Center Publishing House</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">451868</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12731/3033-5973-2026-15-2-329</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">QJYEOG</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Economic policy and public administration</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Экономическая политика и государственное управление</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The mediating role of fertility pressure in the relationship between policy communication and fertility intentions: evidence from China</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Опосредующая роль репродуктивного давления во взаимосвязи между коммуникацией демографической политики и репродуктивными намерениями: на примере Китая</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8839-5156</contrib-id><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yifan</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD student, School of Public Administration and Entrepreneurship</p></bio><email>nihanaksubj3z2x@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Ural Federal University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><content-language>en</content-language><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-06-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-03-22"><day>22</day><month>03</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Yifan Zhang</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, Чжан Ифань</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Yifan Zhang</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Чжан Ифань</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rcsi.science/2070-7568/article/view/451868">https://journals.rcsi.science/2070-7568/article/view/451868</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Background. Declining fertility and population ageing represent a serious challenge for major world economies. Despite substantial investment in family policy, fertility continues to fall, indicating that existing theories of how policy affects reproductive decisions remain incomplete. Most policy-evaluation methods focus on the direct link between measures and behavior, ignoring the complex psychological and socio-economic processes underlying the decision to have a child.</p> <p>Purpose. To identify and quantify the mediating role of fertility pressure in the causal relationship between demographic policy communication and individual fertility intentions in China. The research tasks are: (1) to measure the direct effect of policy communication; (2) to estimate the indirect effect through fertility pressure; (3) to assess the economic significance of both effects for family-policy improvement.</p> <p>Materials and methods. Between June 2024 and April 2025, 475 valid questionnaires were collected from respondents across different regions of China via an online platform. Structural equation modelling (SPSS 29), Baron and Kenny’s stepwise regression, and bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (5000 iterations) were applied to test the mediating effect.</p> <p>Results. The findings reveal that demographic policy communication has a “double-edged sword” effect on fertility intentions: a significantly negative direct effect (β = −1.6297; p &lt; 0.001) and a significantly positive indirect effect mediated by fertility pressure (β = 0.8251; p &lt; 0.001). Current policy promotion unintentionally amplifies the perceived costs of childbearing, yet effective pressure reduction does foster fertility intentions. To enhance the economic effectiveness of demographic policy, emphasis should shift from mere information delivery to substantive support.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Обоснование. Снижение рождаемости и старение населения представляют собой серьёзный вызов для крупных экономик мира. Несмотря на значительные инвестиции в семейную политику, рождаемость продолжает снижаться, что свидетельствует о неполноте существующих теорий влияния политики на репродуктивные решения. Большинство методов оценки политики сосредоточено на прямой связи между мерами и поведением, игнорируя сложные психологические и социально-экономические процессы, лежащие в основе принятия решения о рождении ребёнка.</p> <p>Цель исследования. Выявить и количественно оценить опосредующую роль репродуктивного давления в причинно-следственной связи между коммуникацией демографической политики и репродуктивными намерениями индивида в контексте Китая. Задачи: (1) измерить прямой эффект коммуникации политики; (2) оценить косвенный эффект через репродуктивное давление; (3) определить экономическую значимость обоих эффектов для совершенствования семейно-экономической политики.</p> <p>Материалы и методы. С июня 2024 г. по апрель 2025 г. на платформе онлайн-анкетирования было собрано 475 действительных анкет от респондентов из различных регионов Китая. Для проверки опосредующего эффекта применены структурное моделирование (SPSS 29), пошаговый регрессионный анализ по методу Бэрона и Кенни и построение доверительных интервалов методом бутстрэпа (5000 итераций).</p> <p>Результаты. Установлено, что коммуникация демографической политики оказывает на репродуктивные намерения эффект «обоюдоострого меча». Прямой эффект значимо отрицателен (β = −1,6297; p &lt; 0,001), а косвенный эффект через снижение репродуктивного давления – значимо положителен (β = 0,8251; p &lt; 0,001). Это свидетельствует, что существующие способы продвижения политики непреднамеренно усиливают восприятие издержек деторождения, однако при эффективном снижении давления информационная политика способствует росту репродуктивных намерений. Для повышения экономической эффективности демографической политики необходимо смещение акцента с простого информирования на содержательную поддержку и снижение психологического давления.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>fertility policy</kwd><kwd>policy communication</kwd><kwd>fertility pressure</kwd><kwd>fertility intentions</kwd><kwd>mediation analysis</kwd><kwd>population economics</kwd><kwd>China</kwd><kwd>demographic transition</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>демографическая политика</kwd><kwd>коммуникация политики</kwd><kwd>репродуктивное давление</kwd><kwd>репродуктивные намерения</kwd><kwd>анализ опосредующего эффекта</kwd><kwd>экономика народонаселения</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd><kwd>демографический переход</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., &amp; Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population, 29(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PFTYSA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HEYQET</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Baochang, G., Feng, W., Zhigang, G., &amp; Erli, Z. (2007). China’s local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review, 33(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00161.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Baron, R. M., &amp; Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Basten, S., &amp; Gu, B. (2013). National and regional trends in ideal family size in China (pp. 26–31). https://iussp.org/en/event/paper/national-and-regional-trends-ideal-family-size-china</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Becker, G. S. (1993). A treatise on the family: Enlarged edition. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv322v4rc</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Bongaarts, J., &amp; Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137804. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HJXKZF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Cassidy, T., &amp; Sintrovani, P. (2008). Motives for parenthood, psychosocial factors and health in women undergoing IVF. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830701691392</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Frejka, T., Jones, G. W., &amp; Sardon, J.-P. (2010). East Asian childbearing patterns and policy developments. Population and Development Review, 36(3), 579–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00347.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Gyenwali, D., Pariyar, J., &amp; Onta, S. R. (2014). Estimates of delays in diagnosis of cervical cancer in Nepal. BMC Women’s Health, 14(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-29. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QHMDMB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Kreyenfeld, M. (2010). Uncertainties in female employment careers and the postponement of parenthood in Germany. European Sociological Review, 26(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp026. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MYSHKX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Lammich, G. (2024). Lost in transfer — tracing policy diffusion and norm-shaping in Tanzania-China relations. Global Policy, 15(5), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13416. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XORXYP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Lazarus, R. S., &amp; Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Luhmann, N. (2018). Trust and power. John Wiley &amp; Sons.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Miller, W. B. (1992). Personality traits and developmental experiences as antecedents of childbearing motivation. Demography, 29(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061731. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HGBIGL</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., &amp; te Velde, E. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17(6), 848–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>OECD. (2025). Korea’s unborn future: Understanding low-fertility trends. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1b836111-en</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Powell, G. B., Jr. (2004). The quality of democracy: The chain of responsiveness. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Rousseau, J.-J. (2013). The social contract. In S. Lazar (Ed.), The anthropology of citizenship: A reader (pp. 35–53). Wiley-Blackwell. (Original work published 1762)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Thévenon, O., &amp; Gauthier, A. H. (2011). Family policies in developed countries: A ‘fertility-booster’ with side-effects. Community, Work &amp; Family, 14(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2011.571400</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. (2020). Influence of parenting costs on second-child fertility anxiety among adults of childbearing age in China: The moderating role of gender. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020920657. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OMDQFA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, X., Chen, L., Fu, L., &amp; Maytin, L. (2022). Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: A measurement scale. Implementation Science Communications, 3(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00284-4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TVJPYK</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
